Borderlands (Zev Berman, 2007): 6.5/10

The Magic Flute (Ingmar Bergman, 1975): 7/10

La Guerre Est Finie (Alain Resnais, 1966): 7/10

Speed Racer (The Wachowski Brothers, 2008): 8/10


My Photo
Name:
Location: milwaukee, wi

Monday, January 21, 2008

Cloverfield (Matt Reeves, 2008)




By now, everyone (or at least $40 million worth of people) has seen this thing, so there are spoilers abound in my review. Be forwarned!

By now, there's been over six months of buildup for this movie. Strange that people (including myself) got so excited about a movie from the director of The Pallbearer and a writer from Lost, which I've never gotten into. But the viral campaign was so great, and so successful (at least at first), that plenty of people were inevitably disappointed in the movie. There are plenty of people on the imdb boards complaining about how the movie has no plot, how you don't see the monster enough, how there needs to be more explosions, etc. But that's exactly what I like best about Cloverfield: it's a horror/monster movie from the first-person perspective. We see what people on the ground see, not what the scientists or heroes fighting the monster do. At first, the hand-held camera motions make you sick on the big screen, but you get used to it ], even when it obscures the action and makes this almost too intense to bear.

The movie does actually have a plot, contrary to naysayers; Rob is leaving for Japan the next day, and his brother Jason, future sister-in-law Lily, best friend Hud, Hud's crush Marlena, and Rob's friend/lover/whatever Beth are all at a surprise party to say goodbye to Rob. Things start exploding in Manhattan -- at first, everyone thinks it's an earthquake, but when the Statue of Liberty's head comes flying at them on the street, it's pretty clear it's not. Rob becomes fixated on the task of finding Beth, who he fought with at the eginning of the night but got a phone call from saying she was really hurt in her apartment, and Hud, Lily, and Marlena end up going with him. It seems nonsensical, but I can completely understand why they would follow Rob instead of the military out of Manhattan. Rob has a plan, he's determined, and the rest of them are so confused and terrified that following Rob seems only natural. So their group wanders through the subway tunnels (rats! baby aliens! Both are terrifying), runs through the street, and generally just tries to avoid the monster in order to find Beth.

The monster! I had read beforehand that you get disappointingly few looks at it, so I was actually surprised at the amount of close-ups of the monster we get from this supposedly hand-held camera. It's terrifying, worth the price of admission alone -- when you get the closeups of it right before it devours Hud, I almost couldn't look. Not only is the monster scary, but it drops lots of baby monsters, and their bite apparently makes you bleed from your eyes. Or something. (The imdb faq is very helpful on this account -- the monster's venom could cause the pressure in the body to become too much to bear, or it could be that the monster is like the alien from Alien, and tries to replicate through humans.) The entire movie, save the first 20 minutes, is so intense. It's the most intense experience I've had in the theater since Hostel. How was this thing not rated R?

Many reviews have brought up the inevitable September 11 connections, and while I did think of that when the first shots of buildings on fire were shown, the movie does such a good job of wrapping you up in this monster attack that I didn't think about it again. There is quite a bit of character development, or at least introduction, in the first 20 minutes, but I was more impressed by the growth of Rob's character throughout the movie. It's a hard situation in which to have a character "learn something," but Rob does, and not in an unbelievable way. The actors are all very authentic, which might have had something to do with the fact that they were all relative unknowns.

I'd definitely like to see it again, but I might wait for the second-run theater. It was almost too intense to take in again right away. And if you've seen the movie, but didn't catch the little surprise in the final scene with Rob and Beth on the ferris wheel (I did, I was too busy crying!), check out the imdb faqs. And apparently, after the credits, there's a whisper of "help me" that, played backwards, is this:

boomp3.com

Sounds like a sequel is likely. I'll be waiting.

8.5/10

Labels: , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Cloverfield in brief

Awesome. Not surprising it was the highest-grossing January opening ever (but boo for beating out Hostel, which I think had the record beforehand).



More soon!

Labels: , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Marcus Theaters not showing Cloverfield

For those of you in the midwest like me, Marcus Theaters won't be playing Cloverfield. This is a giant blow, as in the Milwaukee area, where I am, Marcus has a giant monopoly over theaters. There's probably 15 Marcus theaters, 2 Landmark Theaters, 1 big AMC theater, and then only one or two independently owned theaters.

Marcus has a problem with what Paramount charges for movies, as they refused in December to show Sweeney Todd. I obviously have a problem with a studio charging a theater exorbitantly for big movies, but I have a bigger problem with the theater chain, especially one with such a ridiculous monopoly as Marcus, basically dictating what movies most people in Milwaukee can and can't see. The only theaters that are showing Cloverfield this weekend are ones in pricey suburbs where everyone obviously can't go/isn't welcome. So both sides are wrong, but I'm angriest at Marcus Theaters, especially since I definitely want to go see Cloverfield this weekend (everything I've read said you've got to see the movie the first weekend in order to not ruin the surprise).

Labels: , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Thursday, January 10, 2008

More on Cloverfield

So, the time for Cloverfield is almost here -- man, I remember when January 18, 2008 seemed interminably far into the future! Harry Knowles from AICN has seen the film and has a write-up here. I know that Knowles has a knack (to say the least) for going overboard about projects that he likes, no matter what, but damn, does his review make it sound good. Like, better than it has any right to be, being directed by the guy who did The Pallbearer and only produced by JJ Abrams, whose work I haven't really liked to this point anyway.

I guess I'm just a sucker for movies that take the typical (the monster movie) and show it from a different point of view (in this case, as Knowles puts it, in the eyes of the people running away from the monster, rather than the people trying to save the world). It's a much more populist view on the monster movie, and, in real life, would we even have any heroes like there are in most movies?

I'm going next weekend, for sure.

Labels: , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Cloverfield




I'm as surprised as anyone that I've been sucked into the JJ Abrams top-secret project with the code name Cloverfield. I mean, I'm certainly not a fan of Felicity, or Alias, or Armageddon, or MI:III, and I have to admit I've never really given Lost a chance (although now I want to). But this thing has a grip on me, and has for the last week and a half. If you don't know about it (I'm going to doubt there are many internet geeks who don't by now), check out the wikipedia page for info.

So, now that we know the Ethan Haas websites don't have anything to do with Cloverfield, and that slusho.jp has been found, what do we have? Well, nothing. At least, nothing more than Abrams wants us to have. Every speculation centers around the fact that Abrams (producing, although he's known to take control of productions) will be adapting already created material for the screen (such as Cthulhu - which I'm still cheering for - or Godzilla, which has been pretty well debunked), and while I do think that's a possibility, I also think that's only because if we were to assume it's something Abrams and crew made up, we'd have nowhere to go. So while Cthulhu and countless other things would be cool, I'm beginning to hope more and more that this is an original (though possibly based on something) monster/whatever, because then we can be shocked in the theater.

New, cryptic pictures are being posted regularly on the official site, which make this project scarier every time something new appears. The last photo, people running in a cloud of bright fog, is obviously reminiscent of 9/11 - what a bold choice in graphic! The pure obliviousness in the first photo, compared to the terror evoked in the other two, is remarkable. In short, everything JJ Abrams is doing for this film is sucking me in completely. I can only hope this keeps up for the next six months.

Labels: ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!